Kant and Moral Values Essay -- Philosophy Essays Papers

Kant says that incorrupt determine are satisfactory without qualification. This assertion and exchangeable remarks of Plato can be understood in terms of a drive away to moral data themselves in the following ways 1. deterrent example determine are objectively good and not relative to our judgments 2. Moral uprightness is intrinsic goodness grounded in the nature of acts and independent of our subjective merriment 3. Moral goodness expresses in an essentially new and higher scent out of the idea of value as such 4. Moral Goodness cannot be abused like intellectual, aesthetic, temperamental and other value 5. Moral values are good in that they never must be sacrificed for every other value, because they are incomparably higher and should sheer(a)ly and first be sought for 6. Moral goodness makes the person as such good 7. All three different modes of participation in moral values are linked to the absolute, most necessary and highest good for the person 8. Moral determine are goods in the unrestricted sense by universe pure perfections in the sense that neither in this world nor extracurricular it can we find anything that could be called good unqualifiedly except moral goodness which is absolutely repair to possess than not to possess. 9. Moral Values are unconditionally good because they are never just intend towards ends. 10. Moral values imply a new type of ought which elucidates the absolute sense in which they are good. Conclusion These distinctions allow a better grasp of Kant and Plato as well as of a central estimable truth decisive for the moral education of humankind. Kant calls moral values the entirely values that are good without qualification, and thereby states something very profound nigh morality. Let us read his great text in which he expresses ma... ...1961. S. 58-84.(8) See John Finnis, Fundamentals of Ethics (Oxford Clarendon Press, 1983) see in like manner the analogous author, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford C larendon Press, 1980).(9) See on this Anselm von Canterbury. Monologion, ch. 15. See also Josef Seifert, Essere e persona. Verso una fondazione fenomenologica di una metafisica classica e personalistica. (Milano Vita e Pensiero, 1989), ch. 5.(10) Also in Anselm the deepest message of maius is a moral one. Compare my Gott als Gottesbeweis (Heidelberg Universittsverlag C. Winter, 1996), ch. 11.(11) See on this Ethics, second edn (Chicago Franciscan Herald Press, 1978), ch. 17-18 Josef Seifert, Josef Seifert, Essere e persona, cit., ch. 9.(12) On a sevenfold indigence of moral acts see Josef Seifert, Was ist und was motiviert eine sittliche Handlung? (Salzburg Univ.Verlag A. Pustet, 1976).