Internet Censorship Essay

Th capacity of th information suprhighway has xplodd in th rcnt yars. It ncompasss th ast and th wst, th land and th sa, and anything our compassionate mind could dram of. This is a good thing, mature? With th knowldg of th world equitable on ons fingrtips, it must(prenominal) b good, right? Sur, if it is usd th right way. A saying gos lik this, Too some(prenominal) of a good thing is bad. It is tru. Th Intrnt dos accommodat a lot of information. In a way, it has too much information. The internet contains certain information that we DONT want minors to defecate access of.Some of these unwanted information might be pornography, gambling, and or so sensitive issues like homosexuality. So what do we do about the immobilize that we dont minors to see? Do we just learn some law and erase it from our precious meshing? No. archetypical of totally, this would be impossible to do because at that place is just too much unwanted information. Second of all, this would defeat the purpose of the profit. In the article The On promissory note conjunctive Publishing Act, it called the Internet the manifestation of humankinds quest for unfathomable two-way fundamental interaction with thought (Cooperative internet).Since there is a wispy line of what is appropriate and what isnt, why should there be a straight-cut line of what things should be banned on the Internet. There should be a unbend regulation on the content of the Internet that would encourage more interaction with this extraordinary tool. Instead of the government dictating what minors should see, parents and teachers should be the ones stepping up and pedagogics minors whats right and whats wrong. To maximize the productivity of the Internet, there must be a balance of restriction and license.When that balance is reached, the Internet will fully flourish. Why should we cling to the Internet? Why should we protect all those pornographic websites? you might ask. The Internet is a wonderful thin g. up to now the heads of our nation, the President and Vice President, believe that the Internet is a powerful educational tool for our children (Family internet). It should not be viewed as an evil thing. Its unique capability to link the worlds knowledge together fulfills any police detectives dream.There is no more need to visit gobs of libraries to find everything one needs. Everything is at ones fingertips. Without a doubt, shortsighted kids wouldnt need the Internet to do query they dont have any query paper due. One mustnt allow the Internet is not just for research academically. It could be used to research recreationally. One stooge research on topic of his interest. A teen male can research about cars. A mom can research on recipes. And a little kid can research on his favorite Disney character.Because of the Internet, a kid can do a lot more things kids before didnt have the privilege of. A kid can know anything and everything around the world, and even out of this world, without passing the comfort of his home. Anything, anything at all. If the Internet is censored, a large amount of these wonderful knowledge will not be accessible anymore. Although censoring does not mean a complete ban, there is no measure at the present that can effectively restrict access and still not block out good website.According to a study through by Electronic Privacy Information Center, the filtering programs block 95-99 percent of the existent available on the Internet that might be of interest to girlish people (Faulty internet). I am not defending the vindication of pornographic websites. Neither am I advocating an easier access to pornography. I just want to point out the fact that websites dedicated to pornography is only(prenominal) a very small percentage of the Internet. If we use the inefficient censorship products out there, we will miss out a lot of the goods that the Internet has to offer. The Supreme Court believes the same.When the Supreme Court struck down the talk Decency Act in 1996, it found that the interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any abstractive but unproven benefit of censorship (Faulty internet). So, should we sacrifice all the goods that the Internet could offer for those measly pornography websites? The Supreme Court divided the same vision for an uncensored Internet when it struck down the communication theory Decency Act, a federal law that outlawed indecent communications online. In the ruling, it declared the Internet a free speech zone.